| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 00 | Table of contents |
General Information Part A: Information about the offeror or the person seeking admission to trading Part B: Information about the issuer, if different from the offeror or person seeking admission to trading Part C: Information about the operator of the trading platform in cases where it draws up the crypto-asset white paper and information about other persons drawing the crypto-asset white paper pursuant to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 Part D: Information about the crypto-asset project Part E: Information about the offer to the public of crypto-assets or their admission to trading Part F: Information about the crypto-assets Part G: Information on the rights and obligations attached to the crypto-assets Part H: Information on the underlying technology Part I: Information on the risks Part J: Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts |
| 01 | Date of notification | 2026-05-13 |
| 02 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
This crypto-asset white paper has not been approved by any competent authority in any Member State of the European Union. The operator of the trading platform of the crypto-asset is solely responsible for the content of this crypto-asset white paper. |
| 03 | Compliance statement in accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | This crypto-asset white paper complies with Title II of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council and, to the best of the knowledge of the management body, the information presented in the crypto-asset white paper is fair, clear and not misleading and the crypto-asset white paper makes no omission likely to affect its import. |
| 04 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (a), (b), (c), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | The crypto-asset referred to in this crypto-asset white paper may lose its value in part or in full, may not always be transferable and may not be liquid. |
| 05 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | The utility token referred to in this white paper may not be exchangeable against the good or service promised in this white paper, especially in the case of a failure or discontinuation of the crypto-asset project. |
| 06 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | The crypto-asset referred to in this white paper is not covered by the investor compensation schemes under Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council or the deposit guarantee schemes under Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| 07 | Warning in accordance with Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
Warning This summary should be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset white paper. The prospective holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto-asset on the content of the crypto-asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other documents pursuant to the applicable national law. This crypto-asset white paper does not constitute a prospectus as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council or any other offer document pursuant to Union or national law. |
| 08 | Characteristics of the crypto-asset |
QNT is an ERC20 token issued on the Ethereum blockchain used within the Quant Network ecosystem in connection with the Overledger infrastructure. Overledger is an operating system that enables interoperability between different distributed ledger technologies and existing systems. It provides a gateway-based approach that allows applications to connect to multiple blockchains simultaneously without requiring changes to the underlying networks. Within this framework, QNT is used to access the Overledger infrastructure. The token is required to obtain licences for the use of Overledger and to enable the operation of applications built on the infrastructure. The token is therefore utilised as part of the access and licensing model implemented by Quant Network. Holders of QNT may use the token in accordance with the technical requirements of the Overledger infrastructure and any applicable licensing arrangements. The ability to use the token is dependent on access to compatible infrastructure and compliance with applicable terms set by Quant Network. Transactions involving QNT are recorded on a distributed ledger and, once confirmed, cannot be reversed. There are no inherent rights attached to QNT beyond its functional use within the Quant ecosystem. Any access to services is subject to separate contractual or technical conditions defined by Quant Network. |
| 09 |
The QNT token provides access to services within the Quant Overledger infrastructure. It enables developers and users to utilise the infrastructure and associated services provided by Quant Network AG. These services include the development, deployment and use of multi-chain applications (MApps), as well as interaction with tools such as the Overledger Software Development Kit (SDK) and Blockchain Programming Interface (BPI). Access to applications within the Quant ecosystem may require the holding of a minimum quantity of QNT tokens. The token is also used within the infrastructure for authentication and authorisation purposes, enabling users to access specific functionalities and services. The quality and scope of these services depend on the continued development and operation of the Overledger infrastructure, including the release of new features, integrations and enterprise solutions. |
|
| 10 | Key information about the offer to the public or admission to trading | The token has been admitted to trading to the trading platform operated by Bitstamp Europe S.A. on its own initiative. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| A.1 | Name | N/A |
| A.2 | Legal form | N/A |
| A.3 | Registered address | N/A |
| A.4 | Head office | N/A |
| A.5 | Registration date | N/A |
| A.6 | Legal entity identifier | N/A |
| A.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A |
| A.8 | Contact telephone number | N/A |
| A.9 | E-mail address | N/A |
| A.10 | Response time (Days) | N/A |
| A.11 | Parent company | N/A |
| A.12 | Members of the management body | N/A |
| A.13 | Business activity | N/A |
| A.14 | Parent company business activity | N/A |
| A.15 | Newly established | N/A |
| A.16 | Financial condition for the past three years | N/A |
| A.17 | Financial condition since registration | N/A |
| N | Field | Content | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.1 | Issuer different from offerror or person seeking admission to trading | TRUE | |||||||||
| B.2 | Name | QNT Services AG | |||||||||
| B.3 | Legal form | MVII | |||||||||
| B.4 | Registered addess | 16, Dammstrasse, Train, 6300 | |||||||||
| B.4 | Country | ||||||||||
| B.4 | Sub-division | CH-ZG | |||||||||
| B.5 | Head office | 16, Dammstrasse, Train, 6300 | |||||||||
| B.5 | Country | ||||||||||
| B.5 | Sub-division | CH-ZG | |||||||||
| B.6 | Registration date | 2017-10-20 | |||||||||
| B.7 | Legal entity identifier | N/A | |||||||||
| B.8 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | CHE260956363 | |||||||||
| B.9 | Parent company | Not applicable | |||||||||
| B.10 | Members of the management body |
|
|||||||||
| B.11 | Business activity | QNT Services AG develops and provides blockchain technology solutions and interoperability platforms that facilitate communication and interaction across multiple existing and future distributed ledger networks. | |||||||||
| B.12 | Parent company business activity | Not applicable |
| N | Field | Content | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.1 | Name | Bitstamp Europe S.A. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.2 | Legal form | 5GGB | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.3 | Registered address | 40, avenue Monterey, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.3 | Country | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| C.3 | Sub-division | L-2163 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.4 | Head office | 40, avenue Monterey, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.4 | Country | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| C.4 | Sub-division | L-2163 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.5 | Registration date | 2015-05-19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.6 | Legal entity identifier | 549300XIBGTJ0PLIEO72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | Bitstamp Europe S.A. is registered with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register under the number B196856. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.8 | Parent company | Robinhood Markets, Inc with its registered office at 85 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.9 | Reason for crypto-asset white paper Preparation | Bitstamp Europe S.A., acting in its capacity as a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) and operator of a trading platform, has prepared this crypto-asset white paper to support the admission to trading of the crypto-asset on its platform and to provide users with the information required under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA). | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.10 | Members of the management body |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| C.11 | Operator business activity |
Bitstamp Europe S.A. is a Crypto-Asset Service Provider authorised with the CSSF under the number N00000003 to provide the following crypto-asset services:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| C.12 | Parent company business activity | Robinhood Markets, Inc. is the parent holding company of the Robinhood group. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.13 | Other persons drawing up the crypto-asset white paper according to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | MiCA Crypto Alliance Limited | |||||||||||||||||||||
| C.14 | Reason for drawing the white paper by persons referred to in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | MiCA Crypto Alliance Limited was mandated to assist in the white paper preparation by Bitstamp Europe S.A. Bitstamp Europe S.A. retains the role of person seeking admission to trading. |
| N | Field | Content | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.1 | Crypto-asset project name | Quant | ||||||||||||
| D.2 | Crypto-asset name | Quant | ||||||||||||
| D.3 | Abbreviation | QNT | ||||||||||||
| D.4 | Crypto-asset project description |
The Quant project is centred on the development and commercialisation of Overledger, an interoperability infrastructure designed to enable communication and interaction between different distributed ledger technologies (DLTs), enterprise systems, and digital networks. The project seeks to address fragmentation within the blockchain ecosystem by providing a unified interface through which applications and systems can operate across multiple networks without requiring modification of the underlying protocols. Overledger functions as a middleware and gateway layer, connecting blockchains, application programming interfaces (APIs), and legacy systems through a standardised architecture. It enables the development of mApps capable of interacting with multiple distributed ledger networks simultaneously, as well as integrating with traditional financial and technological infrastructure. This approach facilitates interoperability across otherwise isolated systems and supports the exchange of data and digital assets across networks. In addition to Overledger, the project includes further components aimed at enabling institutional adoption and advanced financial use cases. Quant Flow is presented as an infrastructure layer designed to facilitate programmable financial flows and interoperability between digital assets, payment systems, and financial institutions. It is intended to support the orchestration of complex financial transactions across multiple networks, including use cases such as cross-border payments, liquidity management, and settlement processes. Quant Fusion is a solution focused on enabling institutional decentralised finance (DeFi) by providing a framework through which traditional financial institutions can access decentralised infrastructure in a controlled and compliant manner. It aims to bridge decentralised and traditional finance by enabling regulated participation in digital asset ecosystems. QuantNet connects banks, financial institutions, tokenised money systems, and digital asset infrastructure through a single programmable interoperability gateway. The infrastructure is designed to enable the secure movement of value and data across public and private distributed ledger networks, traditional payment systems, and tokenised asset platforms with operational certainty, compliance controls, and interoperability functionality. QuantNet facilitates communication and interoperability between disparate systems without requiring participating institutions to replace existing infrastructure. These components are positioned within the broader objective of enabling institutional-grade interoperability and financial infrastructure, particularly in areas such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), tokenisation of assets, cross-border payments, and digital capital markets. The project is primarily targeted at enterprise and institutional users, including financial institutions, central banks, public sector bodies, and large corporations. Its solutions are designed to operate within regulated environments and to integrate with existing financial systems. The associated crypto-asset, QNT, operates within the ecosystem. It is used to access Overledger and related services, including licensing, platform usage, and developer access. The token functions as part of the access mechanism to the platform’s infrastructure and does not confer ownership rights, governance rights, or claims on underlying assets. |
||||||||||||
| D.5 | Details of all natural or legal persons involved in implementation of crypto-asset project |
|
||||||||||||
| D.6 | Utility Token Classification | TRUE | ||||||||||||
| D.7 | Key Features of Goods/Services for Utility Token Projects |
The QNT token provides access to the Quant Overledger technology, which constitutes a software infrastructure designed to enable interoperability between distributed ledger technologies and to support the development and operation of applications across multiple blockchain networks. The infrastructure allows applications to communicate and exchange data across different blockchain environments, thereby addressing the limitations associated with single-ledger dependency and enabling cross-chain functionality. Through the use of QNT, developers are able to access tools including the Overledger Software Development Kit and the Blockchain Programming Interface, which facilitate the creation and deployment of multi-chain applications without requiring detailed knowledge of individual blockchain protocols. These applications are capable of operating across multiple distributed ledger technologies while maintaining consistent logic and functionality. The Overledger infrastructure is designed as an interoperability gateway that enables communication and interaction between multiple distributed ledger technologies, enterprise systems, payment infrastructures, and external data environments without requiring modification of the underlying blockchain protocols. Through standardised APIs and gateway functionality, Overledger facilitates the development and operation of multi-chain applications and supports interoperability across public and private blockchain networks. Access to the infrastructure and its associated services is controlled through the QNT token, which is used for authentication and authorisation within the ecosystem. These goods and services depend on the continued development and operation of the platform. |
||||||||||||
| D.8 | Description of past milestones |
Past Milestones The development of the Quant Network project has followed a phased and progressive roadmap, beginning with the initial conception of the Overledger concept in July 2015 based on practical use cases in industry and government, followed by the development and approval of blockchain standardisation proposals between April and October 2016, and the creation and patenting of TrustTag technology in December 2016. In March 2017, dedicated research into blockchain interoperability commenced, leading to the conceptualisation of the Overledger operating system, with core research and design completed by October 2017 and prototype development initiated in November 2017. The Swiss entity for Quant Network, QNT Services AG, was incorporated in October 2017 as a Swiss Aktiengesellschaft (“AG”). This was followed by a patent filing in December 2017 and a pre-sale phase targeting institutional participants between December 2017 and March 2018, ahead of the pre-TGE and public token generation event conducted between March and April 2018. Subsequent milestones included the release of initial technological components in Q2 2018, such as the first version of TrustTag and the open-source SDK (v0.1a), the deployment of Software-as-a-Service products and continued patent expansion in Q3 2018, and the launch of the Quant App Store alongside an updated SDK in Q1 2019. Further planned developments included the introduction of enterprise-grade multi-chain applications and advanced functionalities, such as cross-chain “Treaty Contracts,” in Q3 2019. Quant has developed Quant Fusion as a framework intended to extend the interoperability capabilities of the Quant ecosystem. Quant Fusion has been structured around two principal components, namely the Multi-Ledger Rollup and the Network of Networks. The Multi-Ledger Rollup has been designed to support execution and settlement across multiple Layer 1 blockchains within a shared environment. The Network of Networks has been designed to allow users to connect nodes and blockchain networks to Fusion. Quant has delivered the Multi-Ledger Rollup devnet, which was launched with invited testers on selected public blockchain testnets using pre-selected trusted node providers. Quant has also delivered the Multi-Ledger Rollup testnet, which was launched for Quant Connect users on selected public blockchain testnets using pre-selected trusted node providers. Quant has completed the selection of pre-selected trusted node providers for the first phase of Fusion. Quant delivered bring-your-own-node functionality for selected networks, enabling Quant Connect users to connect nodes to Fusion for selected networks. Quant has delivered the Fusion App Framework, which provides a framework for deploying and releasing private or public applications that can use Fusion private or public networks. |
||||||||||||
| D.8 | Description of future milestones |
Future Milestones Quant plans to continue developing Overledger as an infrastructure that supports the development and deployment of applications operating across multiple distributed ledger technologies. Quant also plans to continue developing Quant Fusion as infrastructure for multi-ledger execution, settlement, application deployment and network connectivity. In addition, Quant plans to launch the Multi-Ledger Rollup mainnet for Quant Connect users on selected public blockchain mainnets, using pre-selected trusted node providers, within a small number of months. Quant further plans to expand the Multi-Ledger Rollup mainnet through Mainnet+, which is intended to connect the Multi-Ledger Rollup to additional public or permissioned networks. |
||||||||||||
| D.9 | Resource allocation |
An allocation of 68.19% of QNTs was reserved to the market through the token generation event (TGE), while 31.81% were retained by Quant Network, subject to vesting arrangements. Of this retained portion, around 13.67% of total supply was allocated to founders, team members, advisors, and service providers, subject to a vesting period. The remaining portion, representing 18.13%, was allocated as a reserve to support ongoing operational costs and ecosystem development. Following the conclusion of the TGE, a token burn was conducted in September 2018, which reduced the overall token supply. Accordingly, the allocation percentages described above reflect the pre-burn allocation structure at the time of issuance. |
||||||||||||
| D.10 | Planned use of Collected funds or crypto-Assets | Funds raised through the TGE were primarily used to develop and operate the Overledger infrastructure and its ecosystem. This includes investment in technology development, infrastructure, SaaS and enterprise products, and the Quant App Store. Additional resources are allocated to security, intellectual property, business development, and general operational expenses. Retained QNT tokens support ecosystem growth and long-term sustainability. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| E.1 | Public offering or admission to trading | |
| E.2 | Reasons for public offer or admission to trading | By admitting the QNT asset to trading, holders of the token will gain transparent price discovery and improved liquidity. This enables the project’s community and ecosystem participants to more easily enter and exit positions, supporting a dynamic and efficient market. |
| E.3 | Fundraising target | N/A |
| E.4 | Minimum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.5 | Maximum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.6 | Oversubscription acceptance | N/A |
| E.7 | Oversubscription allocation | N/A |
| E.8 | Issue price | N/A |
| E.9 | Official currency or any other crypto-assets determining the issue price | N/A |
| E.10 | Subscription fee | N/A |
| E.11 | Offer price determination method | N/A |
| E.12 | Total number of offered/traded crypto-assets |
12072738
The number of QNT crypto-assets in circulation may vary over time due to distribution dynamics, secondary market activity, and the use of tokens within the Overledger ecosystem. The contract was initialised with a supply of 45,467,000 QNT in 2018. On the 14th of September 2018, a subsequent burn reduced the total supply to approximately 14,612,493 QNT. The maximum supply of QNT is capped at 14,881,364 tokens, and no additional tokens can be created beyond this limit. As a result, variations in circulating supply are not driven by issuance mechanisms but instead reflect factors such as tokens held in treasury, tokens locked in enterprise licensing arrangements, tokens held by long-term holders, and tokens available on secondary markets. |
| E.13 | Targeted holders | |
| E.14 | Holder restrictions | N/A |
| E.15 | Reimbursement notice | N/A |
| E.16 | Refund mechanism | N/A |
| E.17 | Refund timeline | N/A |
| E.18 | Offer phases | N/A |
| E.19 | Early purchase discount | N/A |
| E.20 | Time-limited offer | N/A |
| E.21 | Subscription period beginning | N/A |
| E.22 | Subscription period end | N/A |
| E.23 | Safeguarding arrangements for offered funds/crypto-Assets | N/A |
| E.24 | Payment methods for crypto-asset purchase | N/A |
| E.25 | Value transfer methods for reimbursement | N/A |
| E.26 | Right of withdrawal | N/A |
| E.27 | Transfer of purchased crypto-assets | When a client purchases a token on the Bitstamp Europe S.A.'s trading platform, the crypto-asset will be credited to their Bitstamp account. If a client wants to hold the token in their own wallet, they will need to (i) provide an external blockchain wallet address, where the crypto-assets will be sent if a withdrawal is initiated and (ii) satisfy all other requirements applicable to a withdrawal in line with the Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets. |
| E.28 | Transfer time schedule | N/A |
| E.29 | Purchaser's technical requirements | When a client purchases a token on the Bitstamp Europe S.A.'s trading platform, the crypto-asset will be credited to their Bitstamp account and a client does not need to fulfill any other technical requirement to hold the crypto-assets on their Bitstamp account, apart from have either a computer or phone with an internet connection and appropriate software in order to interact with the Bitstamp services. |
| E.30 | Crypto-asset service provider (CASP) name | N/A |
| E.31 | CASP identifier | N/A |
| E.32 | Placement form | N/A |
| E.33 | Trading platforms name | Bitstamp Europe S.A. |
| E.34 | Trading platforms Market identifier code (MIC) | BESA |
| E.35 | Trading platforms access | Investors can access the trading platform through https://www.bitstamp.net or via the Bitstamp applications. |
| E.36 | Involved costs | There are no costs involved in creating an account on the trading platform, however trading fees and other costs apply in accordance with the fee schedule available at https://www.bitstamp.net/fee-schedule. |
| E.37 | Offer expenses | Not applicable |
| E.38 | Conflicts of interest |
There are no conflicts of interest arising at the moment of writing the white paper in relation to the offer or admission to trading. Bitstamp Group has a strict Code of Conduct and Trading Policy in place. They both mitigate the possibility of conflicts of interest. In accordance with the Code of Conduct all officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, contractors and consultants (and other persons, regardless of job or position), are required to report any situation where there is the potential for conflict of interest between their interests and interests of Bitstamp. The Trading Policy that is in place within the Bitstamp Group prohibits all forms of market manipulation and has been designed to prevent insider trading. |
| E.39 | Applicable law | Not applicable, as this point pertains to an "offer to the public", whereas this white paper relates to admission to trading. |
| E.40 | Competent court | Not applicable, as this point pertains to an "offer to the public", whereas this white paper relates to admission to trading. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| F.1 | Crypto-asset type | Crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens |
| F.2 | Crypto-asset functionality |
QNT is the native crypto-asset of the Quant Network ecosystem and is designed to enable access to, and operation of, the Overledger infrastructure, which facilitates interoperability between different DLTs and existing enterprise systems. The primary functionality of QNT is to serve as a licensing and access token for the Overledger infrastructure. Enterprises, developers, and institutions are required to hold or utilise QNT tokens in order to obtain access to Overledger services, including the development and deployment of mApps. Access to the infrastructure is typically structured through time-based licensing models, where a corresponding amount of QNT tokens is locked or utilised for the duration of the licence period. QNT also functions as a means of payment within the ecosystem. It is used to pay for infrastructure usage fees, including gateway operations, transaction-related services, and other Overledger functionalities. The token enables interactions between different participants in the network, including developers, enterprises, and infrastructure providers. In addition, QNT facilitates interoperability by acting as a coordination and settlement mechanism across different blockchain networks and legacy systems connected through Overledger. |
| F.3 | Planned application of functionalities | Not applicable, as all functionalities described in F.2 have already been implemented. |
| F.4 | Type of crypto-asset white paper | |
| F.5 | The type of submission | |
| F.6 | Crypto-asset characteristics |
QNT is a crypto-asset used within the Quant Network ecosystem in connection with the Overledger infrastructure. Following a crypto-asset burn conducted in September 2018, which reduced the overall supply, the total supply of QNT is now fixed at 14,881,364 assets.Within this framework, QNT is used to access the Overledger infrastructure. The token is required to obtain licences for the use of Overledger and to enable the operation of applications built on the infrastructure. The token is therefore utilised as part of the access and licensing model implemented by Quant Network. Holders of QNT may use the token in accordance with the technical requirements of the Overledger infrastructure and any applicable licensing arrangements. The ability to use the token is dependent on access to compatible infrastructure and compliance with applicable terms set by Quant Network. Transactions involving QNT are recorded on a distributed ledger and, once confirmed, cannot be reversed. There are no inherent rights attached to QNT beyond its functional use within the Quant ecosystem. Any access to services is subject to separate contractual or technical conditions defined by Quant Network. The token itself does not grant enforceable rights to goods or services without such arrangements. |
| F.7 | Commercial name or trading name | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| F.8 | Website of the issuer | https://quant.network/ |
| F.9 | Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading | 2026-06-16 |
| F.10 | Publication date | 2026-06-15 |
| F.11 | Any other services provided by the issuer | Not applicable |
| F.12 | Language or languages of the crypto-asset white paper | English |
| F.13 | Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which the white paper relates, where available | N25N2VFT7, Z3SN3NVM7 |
| F.14 | Functionally fungible group digital token identifier, where available | L8M8X31JL |
| F.15 | Voluntary data flag | FALSE |
| F.16 | Personal data flag | TRUE |
| F.17 | LEI eligibility | TRUE |
| F.18 | Home Member State | |
| F.19 | Host Member States |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| G.1 | Purchaser rights and obligations |
Not applicable as the QNT crypto-asset holders do not acquire any ownership, equity, profit participation, repayment, or redemption rights against any natural or legal person associated with the QNT project. Holding QNT does not give rise to contractual claims or entitlements against any natural or legal person. Holding QNT provides only the practical ability to access and use the Overledger infrastructure and associated services in accordance with the technical requirements and contractual terms set by Quant Network. These functionalities are described in field F.2. |
| G.2 | Exercise of rights and obligations | Not applicable as the asset confers no ownership or financial claims and does not impose any legal obligations. |
| G.3 | Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations | Not applicable as the asset confers no ownership or financial claims and does not impose any legal obligations. |
| G.4 | Future public offers | Not applicable |
| G.5 | Issuer retained crypto-assets | 4071034 |
| G.6 | Utility Token Classification | TRUE |
| G.7 | Key features of goods/services of utility tokens |
The QNT token provides access to the Quant Overledger infrastructure, which constitutes a software-based infrastructure designed to enable interoperability between different distributed ledger technologies and to allow applications to operate across multiple blockchain networks. Through the use of QNT, users and developers are able to access a system that facilitates the exchange of data and communication between otherwise incompatible blockchain environments, thereby removing reliance on a single distributed ledger and enabling cross-chain functionality. The infrastructure supports the development and execution of multi-chain applications, which are capable of operating across different blockchain protocols while maintaining a unified application logic. The Overledger architecture is structured in multiple layers, including transaction, messaging, filtering and ordering, and application layers, which together enable the processing, validation and coordination of information across different systems. Developers are provided with standardised tools, including a Blockchain Programming Interface and Software Development Kit, which allow applications to be built and deployed without requiring detailed knowledge of each underlying blockchain protocol. The infrastructure further enables integration with legacy systems and external data sources, allowing existing infrastructure to connect with distributed ledger technologies and supporting broader use cases across enterprise and institutional environments. Access to these services is controlled through the QNT token, which is used within the infrastructure for authentication and authorisation purposes, including access to applications and infrastructure within the Quant ecosystem. |
| G.8 | Utility tokens redemption |
The QNT token does not grant a right of redemption against the issuer. Holders of QNT are not entitled to exchange the token for fiat currency, other assets, or any specific goods or services at a guaranteed value or on demand. The token functions as an access mechanism to the Quant Overledger infrastructure and associated services. Its use is limited to enabling access to the infrastructure and facilitating interaction with its infrastructure. The acquisition of QNT therefore provides the ability to use services within the ecosystem, rather than a claim for redemption or reimbursement. |
| G.9 | Non-trading request | TRUE |
| G.10 | Crypto-assets purchase or sale modalities | Not applicable |
| G.11 | Crypto-assets transfer restrictions | Not applicable |
| G.12 | Supply adjustment protocols | FALSE |
| G.13 | Supply adjustment mechanisms | Not applicable |
| G.14 | Token value protection schemes | FALSE |
| G.15 | Token value protection schemes description | Not applicable |
| G.16 | Compensation schemes | FALSE |
| G.17 | Compensation schemes description | Not applicable |
| G.18 | Applicable law | There is no written legal agreement between the issuer and the crypto asset-holder that sets out the laws that govern the legal relationship between those two parties. In the absence of such an agreement, the laws that govern that relationship will depend on the location of the issuer and the given crypto asset-holder and characteristic performance of the legal relationship, and any agreed intention of the issuer and crypto asset-holder. |
| G.19 | Competent court | There is no written legal agreement between the issuer and the crypto asset-holder that sets out which jurisdiction's courts will have authority to deal with a dispute between the crypto asset-holder and the issuer. In the absence of such an agreement, the laws of the competent court will depend on the location of the issuer and the given crypto asset-holder and characteristic performance of the legal relationship, and any agreed intention of the issuer and crypto asset-holder. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| H.1 | Distributed ledger technology | Not applicable as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| H.2 | Protocols and technical standards |
Token standards QNT implements the ERC-20 token standard on Ethereum Mainnet, providing total supply, balance queries, transfer, transferFrom, approve, and allowance functions. The contract emits a Transfer event on each successful token transfer and an Approval event on each successful approval. Within the Fusion rollup, a QRC20 contract type compatible with ERC-20 is available for public smart contract deployments on the rollup. This is entirely separate from the Ethereum Mainnet QNT contract. No EIP-2612 permit or gasless approval standard is implemented in the Ethereum Mainnet QNT contract. Networking and transport QNT does not operate its own peer-to-peer network. Token transfers and approvals on Ethereum Mainnet are standard Ethereum transactions that propagate through Ethereum's execution-layer peer-to-peer network. Peer discovery runs over UDP using the discv5 protocol. The DevP2P stack, operating over TCP, uses the RLPx protocol for session initiation, authentication, and maintenance. Pending transactions are gossiped between execution-layer nodes so that block builders may select them for inclusion. In the Fusion rollup environment, Quant operates as the sequencer, collecting rollup transactions and building rollup blocks. The rollup is accessed through the Quant Fusion infrastructure. ETH JSON-RPC serves as the interface layer, meaning the rollup is compatible with the existing ecosystem of EVM-compatible tooling, including standard wallets and SDKs. Before JSON-RPC requests are proxied to rollup nodes, they are validated against the sequencer's access-control and permissioning rules. Serialisation ERC-20 specifies the token interface rather than a standalone serialisation scheme. It defines methods for total supply, balance queries, transfers, transferFrom, approve, and allowance, and requires Transfer and Approval events for the corresponding operations. Ethereum JSON-RPC encodes quantities as compact hexadecimal values prefixed with 0x; addresses, hashes, bytecode, and byte arrays follow the same convention, using two hexadecimal digits per byte. Cryptography and key formats Ethereum accounts use elliptic curve key pairs over the secp256k1 curve. A private key signs transactions, and the corresponding Ethereum address is derived by taking the last 20 bytes of the Keccak-256 hash of the uncompressed public key. QNT introduces no supplementary signature scheme beyond Ethereum's account-signing model. The token contract is a contract account whose behaviour is governed by the deployed code. Contract storage is encoded in a Merkle Patricia Trie whose root forms part of the account state, enabling cryptographic verification of stored data through the root hash alone. Ledger QNT token ownership is maintained as smart-contract state on Ethereum's account-based ledger. Balances are recorded in a storage mapping; a transfer subtracts from the sender's entry and adds to the recipient's. Approvals set an allowance value that a designated spender may draw down via the transferFrom function. The contract also implements increaseApproval and decreaseApproval functions for atomic allowance adjustments. No ownership-control mechanism or proxy upgrade pattern is present in the deployed contract. Execution Ethereum contract code executes on the Ethereum Virtual Machine when the contract account receives a message call. QNT transfers and approvals are Ethereum transactions containing a recipient address, nonce, value, function-call input data, and a gas limit. Execution clients validate and process these transactions before inclusion in a block. In the Fusion rollup, the Multi-Ledger Rollup extends the Optimism technology stack with an optimistic rollup model. New rollup blocks are assumed correct unless a fraud proof is submitted within the challenge window. State roots and transaction batches are distributed across connected blockchains for data availability, and users may exit the rollup without the sequencer's co-operation by posting on-chain proof of token ownership. Approvals and access controls The approve, allowance, transferFrom, increaseApproval, and decreaseApproval functions enable third parties to spend QNT on behalf of token holders, as required by exchanges, DeFi protocols, and custody integrations. Interaction with the Fusion rollup requires prior registration through Quant Connect, and KYC verification is mandatory for Mainnet rollup transactions. Contracts deployed on the rollup may be public, permissioned, or private; public contracts are subject to a whitelist maintained by Quant. These controls apply exclusively to the rollup environment and do not affect Ethereum Mainnet QNT transfers. External APIs Ethereum JSON-RPC enables external software to query the token contract, submit signed transactions, estimate gas, and retrieve receipts and event logs through any Ethereum-compatible node. Overledger provides an additional API layer during transaction preparation, returning gas, maxPriorityFeePerGas, and maxFeePerGas for Ethereum-based interactions. Fusion exposes rollup state, including balances, transaction history, and accessible contracts, through permissioned APIs and user interfaces rather than a traditional public block explorer, consistent with the rollup's access-control model. |
| H.3 | Technology used |
Implementation and architecture The Ethereum Mainnet QNT contract is a Solidity smart contract comprising five components: ERC20Basic, which defines the core token interface; SafeMath, a library providing arithmetic overflow and underflow protections; BasicToken, which inherits from ERC20Basic and uses SafeMath to implement total supply, balance queries, and token transfers; ERC20, which extends BasicToken with allowance, transferFrom, and approve interfaces; and StandardToken, which inherits from both ERC20 and BasicToken and adds increaseApproval and decreaseApproval functions, the token constants (name, symbol, decimals), a crowdsale address, and an onlyCrowdsale modifier restricting the mint function. Apart from its internal library use, the contract makes no external smart-contract calls. Quant Fusion is structured around two complementary layers. The Multi-Ledger Rollup supports execution and settlement across multiple Layer 1 blockchains, both permissionless and permissioned, within a single shared environment. The Network of Networks enables participants to integrate their own nodes and blockchain networks into the Fusion ecosystem, providing modular extensibility with embedded privacy and fine-grained access controls. Runtime and build parameters The QNT contract executes on the EVM. The Solidity pragma in the audited contract is ^0.4.21, which EtherAuthority flagged as an outdated version and recommended upgrading to above 0.8.7 for any future deployment. The Fusion rollup is also EVM-compatible, extending the Optimism technology stack under an optimistic rollup execution model. Dependencies The QNT contract uses the SafeMath library for arithmetic safety and ERC-20 standard interfaces for token interaction. These are industry-standard open-source components and are not used in external smart-contract calls. Fusion's cross-chain infrastructure relies on deposit contracts and message contracts deployed across connected chains for deposit and withdrawal workflows. Layer 2 proofing and data availability Fusion's Multi-Ledger Rollup uses an optimistic rollup model in which new rollup blocks are assumed correct unless challenged within the fault-proof window. State roots and transaction batches are distributed across connected blockchains for data availability. Deposits require token approval followed by a call to the deposit contract on the relevant Layer 1 chain. The contract validates the request, checks token whitelisting and the user's balance, locks the tokens, and issues a cross-chain message to effect the rollup transfer. When QNT is deposited, the user receives the rollup's native coin rather than an anchored ERC-20 representation; the native coin balance is read through the Ethereum eth_getBalance RPC method. Withdrawals follow a fault-proof-based exit mechanism requiring on-chain verification before assets are released on the Layer 1 chain. Deployment and addresses The audited Ethereum Mainnet QNT contract is deployed at 0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675, reviewed from StandardToken.sol on 14 May 2024. Published testnet deposit contract addresses for the Fusion rollup are: on Ethereum Sepolia, 0xca7b5227a6983a1d5c5841df2e8edff12bf59deb; on Polygon Amoy, 0x4603d005f60d4f6a4ed54279274767d5f47d3b63; and on Quant's Besu private testnet, 0xe32ca85bee804c26ece4106c6bde609cc92a5e94. These are testnet addresses. The Fusion Mainnet is at the time of writing within a small number of months of launch; production deposit contract addresses have not yet been publicly documented. Client interfaces and SDKs QNT is accessible through any Ethereum-compatible JSON-RPC interface, supporting contract reads for balance and allowance queries, signed transaction submission for transfers and approvals, gas estimation, and event log retrieval. Overledger provides an API layer returning Ethereum fee estimation fields during transaction preparation. Fusion exposes rollup state through permissioned APIs and user interfaces for balances, transaction history, and accessible smart contracts. |
| H.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
QNT does not have an independent consensus mechanism. Transactions on Ethereum Mainnet are validated, ordered, and finalised through Ethereum's proof-of-stake consensus. Validators deposit 32 ETH into the Ethereum deposit contract to participate. Time is divided into 12-second slots grouped into 32-slot epochs; one validator is randomly selected as block proposer per slot, and a committee of validators attests to block validity. Validators receive rewards for correct attestations, block proposals, and participation in sync committees. Slashable offences, including proposing multiple blocks for the same slot or submitting conflicting attestations, result in partial burning of the validator's staked ETH and removal from the validator set. The Fusion rollup uses a sequencer model. Quant acts as the sequencer, collecting rollup transactions and building rollup blocks. Because the rollup uses an optimistic design, blocks are not individually verified by a committee; they are assumed correct unless a fraud proof is submitted. Users may exit the rollup independently by posting proof of token ownership on the relevant Layer 1 chain without requiring the sequencer's co-operation. |
| H.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees |
Network-level fees QNT transfers on Ethereum Mainnet incur gas fees denominated in ETH. Gas measures computational effort; each transaction specifies a gas limit. The total fee comprises a base fee, which is burned upon block inclusion, and a priority fee paid to the block proposer as an incentive for inclusion. The base fee adjusts dynamically according to block occupancy relative to a target size. More complex contract interactions consume more gas than simple transfers. Overledger returns gas, maxPriorityFeePerGas, and maxFeePerGas during transaction preparation for Ethereum-based interactions. Protocol-level fees The QNT token contract imposes no transfer tax, buy tax, sell tax, or proxy-controlled fee mechanism. QNT functions as a utility token on the Overledger infrastructure; Overledger infrastructure fees may be paid in USD or through a QNT subscription, which is a infrastructure-level commercial arrangement distinct from Ethereum gas costs. Within Fusion, QNT deposited into the Multi-Ledger Rollup becomes the native coin used to pay for rollup transactions. Validator and node incentives Ethereum validator incentives are governed by the proof-of-stake protocol and are part of Ethereum's consensus layer, not the QNT token contract. Within Fusion, nodes permitted to participate in the sequencer and verifier infrastructure may earn QNT rewards, subject to a QNT staking requirement. The Fusion roadmap links QNT staking to node participation and QNT reward distribution; this applies to the Fusion infrastructure layer, not to QNT operations on Ethereum Mainnet. Governance of parameters Ethereum's base fee and gas limit are protocol parameters that are adjusted through validator signalling and network upgrades, thereby indirectly affecting the cost of QNT transactions. The QNT token contract has no proxy upgrade mechanism and no general ownership control. No publicly documented governance process exists for modifying QNT token parameters or upgrading the Ethereum Mainnet contract. The mint function is restricted to the crowdsale address; no evidence is publicly available confirming whether this minting path remains operationally active. |
| H.6 | Use of distributed ledger technology | False |
| H.7 | DLT functionality description | Not applicable |
| H.8 | Audit | TRUE |
| H.9 | Audit outcome |
EtherAuthority | 14 May 2024 — Quant Token Smart Contract
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| I.1 | Offer-related risks |
Market volatility and liquidity QNT's market price can fluctuate materially and liquidity can vary across trading venues and pairs. Periods of lower trading activity or limited order-book depth can widen bid-ask spreads and increase slippage, particularly for larger transactions. QNT is not redeemable against a fixed value by Quant or any other entity, and its market price may fall to zero. Large transaction and holder concentration risk QNT has a finite maximum supply of 14,881,364 tokens and a publicly visible holder base on Etherscan. Transfers by sizable holders, or large closely sequenced orders, can materially affect available liquidity and execution quality even without manipulative intent. Exchange access and service-access risk Access to QNT trading or QNT-linked services can be affected by venue policies, KYC requirements, territorial restrictions, sanctions controls, or rejection of orders. Quant may reject orders and restrict access where legal, regulatory, or contractual requirements are not met. Irreversibility and finality Once a QNT transfer is included in a finalised Ethereum block, it cannot be reverted or altered at the protocol level. Mistaken transfers resulting from phishing, incorrectly entered addresses, or social engineering cannot be recovered through any mechanism within the token contract or Ethereum's consensus rules. Market abuse QNT, like other publicly traded ERC-20 tokens, may be subject to market manipulation across fragmented trading venues, including front-running enabled by public mempool visibility, wash trading, spoofing, layering, and coordinated pump-and-dump activity. These risks may be amplified during periods of low order-book depth or when trading is concentrated across a small number of venues. Delisting Risks Bitstamp Europe S.A. might remove the token from trading in line with Bitstamp Markets Trading Rules. |
| I.2 | Issuer-related risks |
Legal and contracting structure risk Quant-related services involve more than one Quant entity, including Quant Network Limited and Quant Network AG. Where QNT is used for services, the contracting entity can differ from the website operator, which can affect applicable rights, obligations, and governing-law analysis for users. Regulatory and compliance restriction risk Quant services are subject to sanctions, anti-money-laundering, anti-bribery, and criminal-law compliance controls. These controls can restrict access to Quant services, delay onboarding, or prevent transactions where compliance conditions are not satisfied. Suspension, throttling, and access discretion risk Quant may suspend, throttle, or disable access to its services for policy breaches, unpaid amounts, security issues, or other contractual grounds. API rate limits and access controls can affect service availability and transaction workflows dependent on Overledger or Quant Connect. Operational availability risk Quant services and documentation are made available on an as-is basis without warranty of uninterrupted or error-free access. Disruptions to Overledger, Quant Connect, or related infrastructure can affect users and developers relying on Quant services for QNT-related functionality. Data handling and privacy risk Quant may collect wallet addresses, account identifiers, device data, IP addresses, KYC data, and other personal information through Quant Connect and associated services. Personal data may be processed or transferred outside the UK and EEA, creating privacy, compliance, and operational risk for users of Quant services. Third-party service provider risk Quant relies on external providers for hosting and identity-checking functions. Amazon Web Services EMEA handles hosting services and Onfido handles identity checking and KYC; outages, policy changes, or processing failures at either provider can directly affect Quant service availability and onboarding capacity. |
| I.3 | Crypto-assets-related risks |
ERC-20 token dependency risk QNT's transferability, balance visibility, and application compatibility depend on Ethereum smart-contract execution and the ERC-20 interface implemented by the QNT contract. Any failure in the EVM execution environment or the QNT contract's core functions would directly impair token utility. Key custody and transfer error risk Control over QNT depends on correct transaction signing and secure management of wallet credentials. Loss, compromise, or misuse of private keys results in permanent loss of control over the associated QNT balance. No recovery mechanism exists within the Ethereum protocol or the QNT token contract. Sending QNT to an incorrect address, an unrecoverable contract address, or the zero address is irreversible. Utility and adoption dependency risk QNT's utility depends on continued adoption of the Overledger ecosystem and Quant Fusion. On Ethereum Mainnet, QNT is required for Overledger infrastructure access and licensing; within Fusion, it is designated as the native rollup coin for transaction payments and is intended to underpin node staking. A material reduction in ecosystem adoption, or a change to the fee or staking model, would reduce or remove these utility drivers. Rollup liquidity and withdrawal risk QNT deposited into the Fusion Multi-Ledger Rollup is transformed into the rollup's native coin. Holders using rollup functionality depend on the correct operation of rollup deposit, withdrawal, and state-recovery mechanisms. Withdrawals are subject to the Layer 1 finalisation period and the optimistic rollup challenge window before funds are released; in testnet conditions on Ethereum Sepolia this has been approximately 20 minutes, though Mainnet conditions may differ. Staking and node-reward risk QNT staking is intended to underpin nodes used by the rollup sequencer and verifiers. Nodes that are not continuously available may be removed from Fusion and staking rewards may be withheld. The current documentation does not describe a mechanism to slash or destroy staked QNT principal for node unavailability; reward withholding rather than principal loss is the described consequence. Changes to the staking design before or after Mainnet launch could alter this risk profile. Supply and mint-function risk The QNT contract includes a mint function callable exclusively by the crowdsale address. The total supply variable is not declared as a constant in the contract code, meaning additional tokens can in principle be minted if the crowdsale address retains its minting authority. No on-chain transaction or publicly documented mechanism confirms that the crowdsale address has renounced this authority or that a permanent maximum supply cap has been enforced at the contract level. The audited initial supply is 45,467,000 QNT, and the independent audit identified the absence of a minting limit as an informational finding. No live freeze, blacklist, kill-switch, or upgrade authority for the QNT Ethereum Mainnet contract is evidenced. Token transparency and audit-submission risk The QNT contract source code is verified as an exact match on Etherscan, supporting independent inspection of the deployed bytecode and ABI. However, no contract security audit is listed in Etherscan's audit-submission record for the QNT contract. An independent audit was conducted by EtherAuthority in May 2024, but it is not linked from Etherscan and may not be immediately visible to holders who rely on Etherscan's audit-submission record as a transparency indicator. Privacy and on-chain traceability risk All QNT transfers occur on a public Ethereum token contract and are permanently visible through Etherscan and other block explorers. Wallet addresses and transaction patterns can be analysed over time and may be correlated with personal data collected through Quant Connect and related services. Scam and fraud risk QNT, as a publicly listed ERC-20 token with significant market profile, may be targeted by fraudulent activity including: deployment of counterfeit tokens bearing the same or similar name on Ethereum or other networks; phishing attacks targeting QNT holders and Quant Connect users; impersonation of Quant Network through social media, email, or communications channels; and fake airdrop or promotional offers. All blockchain transactions are irreversible, and funds transferred to fraudulent addresses or contracts cannot be recovered through any protocol mechanism. |
| I.4 | Project implementation-related risks |
Roadmap and delivery risk Quant Fusion roadmap items are described as general guidelines subject to change according to business and legal requirements. Changes in Mainnet timing, staking configuration, supported network list, or release sequencing can affect expected QNT utility and ecosystem adoption without triggering contractual obligations to holders. Node provider and availability risk Fusion's network model initially relies on pre-selected node providers and requires nodes to remain continuously available. Provider selection constraints, node outages, or removal of unavailable nodes can reduce network resilience and affect QNT staking reward outcomes during early deployment phases. User interface and operational readiness risk Certain Fusion user-interface components and production-readiness activities have been under active development alongside Mainnet infrastructure hardening. Delays or defects in deposit, swap, or withdrawal interfaces can affect user access to rollup functionality, including the mechanism by which QNT becomes the rollup's native coin. Network and connector expansion risk Fusion is designed to support multiple distributed ledgers, blockchains, and user-connected networks. Expansion to additional public, private, or permissioned networks depends on connectors, Quant's review processes, and implementation work. Delays or scope changes in this expansion can affect the timing and breadth of QNT utility across supported chains. SDK and integration-maintenance risk Several official Overledger SDK repositories are archived and no longer maintained. Developers relying on archived SDKs or outdated integration examples may face compatibility, dependency, and maintenance risk unless they migrate to current Developer Hub materials. Transparency and observability timing risk Devnet contract-address publication was deferred during early testing. While Quant committed to logging addresses and timestamped transactions for later publication, deferred disclosure reduces immediate independent observability during early testing phases and may limit the ability of third parties to verify devnet activity at the time it occurs. Standards and external-process risk Secure Asset Exchange Protocol development depends in part on external standards processes. Delays or changes in treatment by relevant standards bodies can affect interoperability standardisation and implementation timelines for cross-chain withdrawal functionality. |
| I.5 | Technology-related risks |
Ethereum base-layer risk QNT inherits Ethereum base-layer risks as an ERC-20 token on Ethereum. Validator collusion, network partitioning, execution-client defects, transaction-inclusion delays, or failures in the finality mechanism can impair QNT transfer execution and settlement. A successful attack on Ethereum's finalised state would require an attacker to expose at least one-third of all staked ETH to slashing, representing a very high economic barrier; this risk cannot be fully eliminated. Ethereum client and validator software risk Ethereum validators operate three separate software components: an execution client, a consensus client, and a validator client. Defects, version divergence, or correlated failures across those components can impair transaction processing, block validation, or network liveness. Smart-contract and ERC-20 implementation risk The QNT contract is compiled with Solidity v0.4.21, a version predating numerous security improvements, EIP implementations, and compiler-level protections introduced in subsequent releases. While the independent EtherAuthority audit found no critical, high, medium, or low severity vulnerabilities in the deployed contract, the use of an outdated compiler version increases the theoretical attack surface relative to contracts compiled with current Solidity releases.Smart-contract flaws, hacks, and protocol changes are identified as events that can create a risk of total loss. Fusion rollup design risk Fusion extends the Optimism technology stack under an optimistic rollup model. Rollup functionality depends on correct transaction sequencing, batch data publication, fraud-proof submission, and withdrawal processing across all connected networks. Defects in any of these components could delay settlement, block withdrawals, or produce incorrect state transitions, affecting QNT holders using the rollup environment. Sequencer concentration risk Quant will act as the sole sequencer of the Multi-Ledger Rollup, controlling transaction ordering and rollup block construction. This creates dependency on Quant's operational continuity for rollup liveness. Sequencer failure, censorship, or extended downtime would prevent new rollup transactions from being processed. Users may exit the rollup to Layer 1 by posting a fault-proof without the sequencer's agreement, but this withdrawal path is subject to the challenge window delay and requires a correctly functioning Layer 1 proof mechanism. Upgradeable-contract and admin-hook risk The Ethereum Mainnet QNT token contract has no proxy pattern and no upgrade mechanism in its deployed code. However, Fusion Firewall smart contracts employed during the devnet phase used upgradeable proxy patterns for rapid iteration. Quant has stated these are intended to be non-upgradeable once live on Mainnet. Full documentation of Mainnet-specific pause, freeze, or kill-switch controls for Fusion infrastructure has not been published in available sources; the deployed Mainnet rollup contract configuration may differ from the devnet model. Access-control and permissioning risk Fusion and Quant Connect apply access controls, KYC requirements, and smart-contract permission categories (public, permissioned, and private). These controls can reduce the on-chain attack surface but may also restrict composability, limit interaction with non-whitelisted contracts, and create dependency on correct permission configuration by Quant. Changes to whitelisting or permissioning rules could affect the accessibility or usability of QNT within the rollup environment. Node and connector-layer risk Fusion routes API requests through nodes and connectors to connected distributed ledgers. Faulty nodes, connector errors, or inconsistent responses across nodes can affect transaction routing, gas-price estimation, data accuracy, and service continuity for QNT-related rollup interactions. Interoperability and withdrawal-route risk Fusion supports withdrawals through Optimism-based routes and Secure Asset Exchange Protocol instant-withdrawal functionality. Errors in cross-ledger message handling or withdrawal-route implementations could delay, block, or misroute assets across supported networks, including QNT transferred between the rollup and connected Layer 1 chains. Explorer and state-observability risk Quant does not intend to support a traditional public block explorer for the Multi-Ledger Rollup. Holders and developers rely on permissioned APIs and user interfaces for rollup balances, transaction histories, and accessible smart contracts, which limits independent verification of rollup state compared to a public block explorer and creates dependence on Quant's API availability. |
| I.6 | Mitigation measures |
Offer-Related Risks
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Mandatory information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| General information about adverse impacts | ||
| S.1 | Name | Bitstamp Europe S.A. |
| S.2 | Relevant legal entity identifier | 549300XIBGTJ0PLIEO72 |
| S.3 | Name of the crypto-asset | Quant |
| S.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
QNT does not have an independent consensus mechanism. Transactions on Ethereum Mainnet are validated, ordered, and finalised through Ethereum's proof-of-stake consensus. Validators deposit 32 ETH into the Ethereum deposit contract to participate. Time is divided into 12-second slots grouped into 32-slot epochs; one validator is randomly selected as block proposer per slot, and a committee of validators attests to block validity. Validators receive rewards for correct attestations, block proposals, and participation in sync committees. Slashable offences, including proposing multiple blocks for the same slot or submitting conflicting attestations, result in partial burning of the validator's staked ETH and removal from the validator set. The Fusion rollup uses a sequencer model. Quant acts as the sequencer, collecting rollup transactions and building rollup blocks. Because the rollup uses an optimistic design, blocks are not individually verified by a committee; they are assumed correct unless a fraud proof is submitted. Users may exit the rollup independently by posting proof of token ownership on the relevant Layer 1 chain without requiring the sequencer's co-operation. |
| S.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees | See H.5 |
| S.6 | Beginning of the period to which the disclosed information relates | 2026-01-01 |
| S.7 | End of period to which disclosed information relates | 2026-05-04 |
| Mandatory key indicator | ||
| S.8 | Energy consumption | 85226.69192 |
| Sources and methodologies | ||
| S.9 | Energy consumption sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Full methodology available at : www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| Supplementary information on principal adverse impacts on climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| Supplementary key indicators | ||
| S.10 | Renewable energy consumption | 0.3725443164 |
| S.11 | Energy intensity | 0.20556 |
| S.12 | Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions – Controlled | 0 |
| S.13 | Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions – Purchased | 127.79642 |
| S.14 | GHG intensity | 0.06704 |
| Sources and methodologies | ||
| S.15 | Key energy sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.16 | Key GHG sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| Optional information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and on other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| Optional indicators | ||
| S.17 | Energy mix | |
| S.18 | Energy use reduction | N/A |
| S.19 | Carbon intensity | 0.32615 |
| S.20 | Scope 3 DLT GHG emissions – Value chain | N/A |
| S.21 | GHG emissions reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.22 | Generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) | 0.13547 |
| S.23 | Non-recycled WEEE ratio | 0.6273420419 |
| S.24 | Generation of hazardous waste | 0.00007 |
| S.25 | Generation of waste (all types) | 0.13547 |
| S.26 | Non-recycled waste ratio (all types) | 0.6273420419 |
| S.27 | Waste intensity (all types) | 0.32673 |
| S.28 | Waste reduction targets or commitments (all types) | N/A |
| S.29 | Impact of the use of equipment on natural resources | Land use: 2013.49742 m² |
| S.30 | Natural resources use reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.31 | Water use | 345.97831 |
| S.32 | Non recycled water ratio | 0.7212745636 |
| Sources and and methodologies | ||
| S.33 | Other energy sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.34 | Other GHG sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.35 | Waste sources and methodologies |
Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Estimates on individual node weight, hazardous components and depreciation rate are used. Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.36 | Natural resources sources and methodologies | Data provided by the MiCA Crypto Alliance as a third party, with no deviations from the calculation guidance of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/422, Article 6(5). Usage of natural resources is approximated through land use metrics. Land use, water use and water recycling are calculated based on energy mix-specific estimates of purchased electricity land intensity, purchased electricity water intensity, and water recycling rates. Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |